Discount Prices on Archery Supplies Right Here
Ive been shooting an arrow really well.
27.5 ctc RIP TKO 300 spine 8.8gpi
125g tip
75g insert
A wrap
4 fletch Heat vanes
Lighted nock
Comes out to 500ish grains just under 15% FOC
Higher FOC arrow, but theres a lot of added weight to the back.
Similar arrow is like to build (ran similar setup last year) –
28 ctc Easton Axis 300 spine 10.7gpi
100g tip
75g insert
A wrap
4 fletch Heat vanes
Regular nock
Comes out to 515ish grains 13.5% FOC
These are very similar arrows – 25g less in the front of the Axis, no lighted nock on the rear (15g difference between lighted nock and regular nock).
So would one be a better arrow because of mechanics? What I mean is Im adding weight to the back so stiffen the shaft of the TKO, but not the Axis. Ive read before that the arrow acts a lot differently by doing this (adding rear weight) versus shooting an arrow like the axis with a little less weight in front.
Yes, I know if one shoots better go with it. Im asking if theres a mechanical advantage between the two.
Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk